Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Sophie’s World Guide

Hypothesis OF KNOWLEDGEFALL 2012 SOPHIE’S WORLD: READING GUIDE DR. Lobby The epic Sophie’s World (1991) by Norwegian creator Jostein Gaarder offers a voyage through the historical backdrop of Western way of thinking just as a post-current investigator story. We picked this perusing for IB Seniors since it ties in so well with our crucial TOK questions and issues. As a result of the scholarly excursion the novel graphs, it makes an ally to Siddhartha which includes, notwithstanding, an eastern antithesis toward the western direction of Gaarder’s novel.For examination and conversation purposes, I have partitioned the novel into the accompanying five areas. Kindly sort out or compose flawlessly your reactions to this guide on discrete pages. Refer to page numbers for all sections you rework or quote in ( ). You are free to include your own remarks/evaluates. Around one area will be expected every week during the initial 5 †a month and a half of the main quarter . We will talk about your reactions during the relegated a long time of class just as take perusing tests on each area. We may likewise compose practice TOK expositions dependent on thoughts and issues introduced in Sophie’s World.Note that this book is an interpretation. It will improve your comprehension on the off chance that you gaze upward Gaarder on the web. Print and study an article you find provocative; this will be a piece of your article record. I)â€Å"The Garden of Eden† †â€Å"Aristotle†pages 1 †120 This initial area presents Sophie and her universe of home and school. It sets up the connection among Sophie and her way of thinking educator, who speaks with her basically through letters. It surveys a portion of the material we concentrated in the spring (Socrates) and some you have concentrated before at Central (Greek folklore). Make a rundown of the characters as you are acquainted with them. Like Sophie, you will start attempting to dis tinguish Hilde and her dad. 2 For each area make a rundown of the significant schools of theory referenced, notinga trademark thinker and portraying his fundamental ideas.(Do this based on Gaarder’s data despite the fact that you might need to discover increasingly around ones that interest you. ) Cite page ##s in text and additionally sources on the off chance that you look into data. 3Find a few instances of how the PLOT of the novel mirrors the different thoughts regarding which Sophie is learning. Discover a few instances of Gaarder’s utilization of the Socratic strategy. 5Compare Plato’s perfect society with the perfect ward depicted by Gonzalo in Act II of The Tempest. II)â€Å"Hellenism† †â€Å"The Baroque†pages 121 †232 In this area you will find the personality of Sophie’s instructor. You will likewise push ahead in time from the Greek philosophical custom to its replacements in European history up to the l600s. 1Describe the conversations of magic and consider how they may connect to a work like Antigone or Chronicle of a Death Foretold. 2Find the picture of history as a clock; at that point attempt to draw the clock. This may help you to remember the learning style spoke to by the shading wheel in Girl With a Pearl Earring. ) 3Make a note when you stumble into jargon that we have characterized in TOK. 4 Continue your rundown of key savants and their thoughts (or if nothing else the qualities of key philosophical periods). 5In light of Siddhartha and other information, give instances of or perceptions on Western direction in Gaarder’s portrayal of the advancement of thoughts. III)â€Å"Descartes† †â€Å"Kant†pages 233 †341 In this area you will start to determine the riddles of Hilde’s and her father’s identities.There will by hybrids between the first plot with Sophie and the tale of Hilde. 1Why does Gaarder decided to structure his story along these lin es? How may this structure show the philosophical thoughts being introduced? 2Pay specific thoughtfulness regarding the division of brain/body in Descartes and to the similitudes/contrasts among Berkeley and Bjerkely. 3 Recall our conversations of the Enlightenment in the work and composing style of Benjamin Franklin. Find a few sections that help light up (haha) Franklin’s text. 4FOR NEW JERUSALEM: SEE SECTION ON SPINOZA, 247-256.Reflect on Alberto’s address considering the play. 5Explain Locke’s relationship to experimentation. Check implications of the term. 6 Compare/differentiate this conversation of Kant with conversation of Kant and obligation morals in our TOK course reading. IV)â€Å"Romanticism† †â€Å"Freud†pages 342 †446 This area highlights Marx, Darwin, and Freud, some of the time called â€Å"The Triple Thinkers† for their effect on late nineteenth †mid twentieth century history, legislative issues, financial ma tters, science, expressions of the human experience, and human conduct. Notice that â€Å"philosophy† has expanded into what we would call separate disciplinary fields. Do you think the Freud part is appropriately positioned and enticing? Why or why not, founded on what you are aware of Freud from Psychology class and on different sorts of scholars remembered for this book? 2Compare the delineation of Freud in Gaarder with that in Brave New World. 3Discuss the parody of Darwinism in Brave New World with the clarification of advancement in Sophie’s World. Note the comparative titles. 4Do you concur that â€Å"philosophy is the reflection of the world spirit†? (371). Would you be able to give a few representations of this case from your different readings or encounters? V)â€Å"Our Own Time† †â€Å"The Big Bang†pages 447 †513 Please look into a meaning of â€Å"existentialism.† Do you concur â€Å"To exist is to make your own lifeâ €  (458)? Who is Sartre? Who is Camus? You read this Algerian-conceived writer’s novel The Stranger in junior IB English. 2Compare meaning of â€Å"paradigm shift† on 464 with Thomas Kuhn’s. 3What book does Alberto purchase Sophie? Clarify. 4What occurs at the nursery party? Apply â€Å"big blast theory† to the plot(s) of the novel. 5Compare/differentiate Gaarder’s and Kuhn’s (and Franklin’s) disposition toward science, in view of the disordered penultimate scene of every novel. 6Why may the book deduce in a paddle boat on a lake? Clarify the political significance of Hilde’s father’s profound inclusion in Lebanon and in United Nations strategies. What are the likenesses and contrasts among Lebanon and the battle Khaled Hosseini portrays in A Thousand Splendid Suns (and The Kite Runner)? What is the significance of both of these settings for IB? What's going on in the spring/summer of 2011 in the Middle East that coul d be comprehended through the perspective of Gaarder’s epic? 8Go back and read the epigraph by Goethe: is this what the novel is intended to represent? How can it do as such? Who is Goethe? What is the significance of the epigraph for TOK?

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Participation Discussion Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Support Discussion Questions - Essay Example As indicated by Sward (2006) an innovation should possibly be executed on the off chance that it increases the value of the organization. In view of this suspicion any procedure improvement while peripheral advantages don't surpass its negligible expense ought to be not be thought of. I like your company’s utilization of the cycle tallying strategy. Expanding the physical stock checking recurrence builds the odds of distinguishing inefficient exercises, for example, worker robbery. Associating with the clients and picking up input from them is an incredible method to acquire significant data. Coming up short on stock is a bad dream. A couple of years prior I worked for an assembling organization. We were building up another item. The bill of materials incorporated an uncommon plastic that was difficult to find anyplace all inclusive. We go through a half year searching for a reasonable provider that would have a consistent flexibly of the crude material. The task was closed down in light of the fact that a hazard the executives investigation verified that stockouts of the material would happen that would close down the creation line. One of the results of a stockout is loss of incomes (Answers, 2009). The situation you referenced about the organization you work for conflicts with conventional business insight. A great many people accept that having a lower stock check and the usage of stock frameworks, for example, JIT are the ideal method to maintain a business. Each industry has its quirks and inward information on its conduct is required so as to settle on great business choices. The Comcast item uses a customization procedure so as to adjust the details dependent fair and square of mechanical progression of the area. As the market necessities of various locales change the organization could move stock starting with one district then onto the next. On the off chance that a stock model gets out of date in one area the organization can in any case utilize that stock to flexibly different areas. Versatility and adaptability are two acceptable properties of a creation

Friday, August 21, 2020

SIPA Event At A Glance U.S. Election 2016 Whats Next Now COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

SIPA Event At A Glance “U.S. Election 2016 What’s Next Now” COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog After the election in November, SIPA began  organizing various activities and events to address post-election issues and concerns. On  November 29, 2016, SIPA held a high-level panel at Columbia Club in midtown, called “U.S. 2016 Election: What’s Next Now?”. The panel was moderated by Merit E. Janow, Dean of SIPA, and featured seven panelists who are top experts in their field of studies, including economics, political science, war and peace studies, energy and environment policy, and urban planning. During the discussion, panelists shared their views on the significant domestic and international challenges that the new administration will face, from a deeply-divided nation  and uncertainty around the policies to future foreign policy and international relations. David Rothkopf, Visiting Professor of International and Public Affairs, first shared his opinion about President-Elect Trump’s strategy in foreign affairs. He pointed out that Trump’s potential policy is likely to shift the United States into a unilateralism, which might jeopardize the traditional transatlantic partnership. Professor Richard K. Betts put it that President-Elect Trump’s foreign policies could be hard to predict, and he shared his opinions on the future relation between US and Russia. When it comes to the domestic policy, University Professor Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Laureate and former chief economist of the World Bank, briefly analyzed Trump’s tax cut and infrastructure plan. He pointed out that to stimulate the economy with massive infrastructure construction could raise the cost of capital and may cause negative effects on the economy. Professor Richard Clarida shared his views on the post-election market reactions and the potential effect of the combination of tight monetary policy and loose fiscal policy. Professor Ester Fuchs discussed the potential policies related with women, such as affordable birth control, abortion right, children care, and paid family leave. Michael Nutter, Professor of Professional Practice in Urban and Public Affairs, who was also the mayor of Philadelphia, expressed concerns on how President-Elect Trump is going to develop proper urban planning policies. While Professor Steven Cohen, Executive Director of Columbia University Earth Institute, discussed the future challenges in energy and environmental policy. Around 70 people participated in the event, including SIPA faculty members, current students, alumni, prospective students, and journalists from major media companies. After the one-hour panel discussion, panelists responded to questions from the audience, covering terrorism, enterprise zone, and incoming elections in Europe, etc. Panelists then encouraged SIPA students and alumni to actively engage in studying and shaping the future of public policy. [Photo by Weiming Shu | Left to right:  Richard Clarida, C. Lowell Harriss Professor of Economics and Professor of International and Public;  Joseph Stiglitz, University Professor and Nobel Laureate;  Ester Fuchs, Professor of International and Public Affairs and Political Science;  Michael Nutter, David N. Dinkins Professor of Professional Practice in Urban and Public Affairs;  Merit E. Janow, Dean of SIPA;  Steven Cohen, Executive Director, Columbia University Earth Institute and Professor in the Practice of Public Affairs;  Richard K. Betts, Leo A. Shifrin Professor of War and Peace Studies and Arnold A. Saltzman Professor of War and Peace Studies; David Rothkopf, Visiting Professor of International and Public Affairs]

SIPA Event At A Glance U.S. Election 2016 Whats Next Now COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

SIPA Event At A Glance “U.S. Election 2016 What’s Next Now” COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog After the election in November, SIPA began  organizing various activities and events to address post-election issues and concerns. On  November 29, 2016, SIPA held a high-level panel at Columbia Club in midtown, called “U.S. 2016 Election: What’s Next Now?”. The panel was moderated by Merit E. Janow, Dean of SIPA, and featured seven panelists who are top experts in their field of studies, including economics, political science, war and peace studies, energy and environment policy, and urban planning. During the discussion, panelists shared their views on the significant domestic and international challenges that the new administration will face, from a deeply-divided nation  and uncertainty around the policies to future foreign policy and international relations. David Rothkopf, Visiting Professor of International and Public Affairs, first shared his opinion about President-Elect Trump’s strategy in foreign affairs. He pointed out that Trump’s potential policy is likely to shift the United States into a unilateralism, which might jeopardize the traditional transatlantic partnership. Professor Richard K. Betts put it that President-Elect Trump’s foreign policies could be hard to predict, and he shared his opinions on the future relation between US and Russia. When it comes to the domestic policy, University Professor Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Laureate and former chief economist of the World Bank, briefly analyzed Trump’s tax cut and infrastructure plan. He pointed out that to stimulate the economy with massive infrastructure construction could raise the cost of capital and may cause negative effects on the economy. Professor Richard Clarida shared his views on the post-election market reactions and the potential effect of the combination of tight monetary policy and loose fiscal policy. Professor Ester Fuchs discussed the potential policies related with women, such as affordable birth control, abortion right, children care, and paid family leave. Michael Nutter, Professor of Professional Practice in Urban and Public Affairs, who was also the mayor of Philadelphia, expressed concerns on how President-Elect Trump is going to develop proper urban planning policies. While Professor Steven Cohen, Executive Director of Columbia University Earth Institute, discussed the future challenges in energy and environmental policy. Around 70 people participated in the event, including SIPA faculty members, current students, alumni, prospective students, and journalists from major media companies. After the one-hour panel discussion, panelists responded to questions from the audience, covering terrorism, enterprise zone, and incoming elections in Europe, etc. Panelists then encouraged SIPA students and alumni to actively engage in studying and shaping the future of public policy. [Photo by Weiming Shu | Left to right:  Richard Clarida, C. Lowell Harriss Professor of Economics and Professor of International and Public;  Joseph Stiglitz, University Professor and Nobel Laureate;  Ester Fuchs, Professor of International and Public Affairs and Political Science;  Michael Nutter, David N. Dinkins Professor of Professional Practice in Urban and Public Affairs;  Merit E. Janow, Dean of SIPA;  Steven Cohen, Executive Director, Columbia University Earth Institute and Professor in the Practice of Public Affairs;  Richard K. Betts, Leo A. Shifrin Professor of War and Peace Studies and Arnold A. Saltzman Professor of War and Peace Studies; David Rothkopf, Visiting Professor of International and Public Affairs]